Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Calmar Steamship Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 5, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 35194PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MASTERSON, District Judge.
On February 27, 1964, the plaintiff, Francis J. Peterson, instituted suit in this Court against Calmar Steamship Corporation, hereafter referred to as Calmar, to recover damages he allegedly incurred as a result of an accident on June 10, 1963. At the time of the accident Peterson was working as a longshoreman, assisting in the loading of cargo aboard a vessel owned by Calmar, i.e. the S/S “Marymar”. In his complaint Peterson charged that the accident resulted from Calmar’s negligent supervision of the loading operation and/or from the allegedly unseaworthy…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Commonwealth v. PetrilloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Lobalzo v. VaroliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Boudwin v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Paul P. Paluch v. Erie Lackawanna Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Van Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Van Buskirk v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Tann v. Service Distributors, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
- Coleman v. Quaker State Coca-Cola Bottling Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Smith v. LeesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.