Legal Opinion

Boudwin v. Yellow Cab Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1963No. Appeal, 289PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Musmanno,

The question presented in this appeal is perhaps one of logic rather than of law, although of course only controverted legal principles can bring a case before this Court for review. In an action involving damages arising out of a tortious accident, is it proper to inform the jury that the injured person is receiving or has received workmen’s compensation? That question has already been met in other cases but it is presented here in a slightly different form. The answer, however, always remains the same.1

The victim of a tort is entitled to receive from his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Lobalzo v. VaroliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Healy v. RennertNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  5. Moidel v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Donald Feeley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  2. Downey v. WestonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Beechwoods Flying Service, Inc. v. Al Hamilton Contracting Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Theodore Gladden v. P. Henderson & Co. v. Lavino Shipping Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  5. Kelly v. Carborundum Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API