Legal Opinion
Lasprogato v. Lasprogato
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 7, 1941PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
The finding of the court discloses these facts: The parties in this case were husband and wife. On November 17, 1936, the plaintiff commenced an action against the defendant for divorce, alleging intolerable cruelty and adultery. In his answer, the defendant denied the allegations of the complaint and in a cross-complaint alleged that the plaintiff had been guilty of intolerable cruelty. On the day of the trial, the parties and their attorneys met and conferred with reference to a settlement of their property rights and the matter of a portion of the defendant’s estate being assigned to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
- Cary v. CarySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Mills v. MillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Maisch v. MaischSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
- Weil v. PoulsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
3Cited by35 opinions
- Sands v. SandsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Crowell v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Scoville v. ScovilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Hooker v. HookerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.