Legal Opinion

Burgner-Bowman Lumber Co. v. McCord-Kistler Mercantile Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 6, 1923No. 24,010PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The plaintiff sued J. M. Leeper, a contractor, to recover for building materials sold him and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on a building belonging to the defendant, The McCord-Kistler Mercantile Company. The defense was that part of the material, consisting of cement, was of inferior quality, and that there was an implied warranty of quality. The trial resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiff for all the material except for the cement, and from this judgment plaintiff appeals.

The sole question is, whether there was an implied warranty…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ehrsam v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Kaull v. BlackerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. American Tank Co. v. Revert Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Johnston v. LanterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Bigger v. BovardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ada-Konawa Bridge Co. v. CargoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Graham v. Bottenfield's, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  3. Professional Lens Plan, Inc. v. Polaris Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  4. Balthazor v. B & B Boiler & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  5. Clark Lumber Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API