Legal Opinion
In re: Apperson
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 18, 2012No. 11-3030, 11-3031PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Defendants William L. Pickard and Clyde Apperson were convicted of drug-related crimes in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. An important witness for the prosecution was informant Gordon Todd Skinner, a criminal associate of Defendants. After the convictions were affirmed on appeal, see United States v. Apperson, 441 F.3d 1162 (10th Cir.2006), Defendants filed motions for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 claiming, among other things, that the prosecution had violated their rights under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- In Re ClineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Spitznas v. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gregory L. Brown v. W. MunizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Lisa Coleman v. William Stephens, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Scott v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2015
- Small v. MilyardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.