Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Wooley

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 29, 1890PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Oreene Circuit Court. — Hon. W. D. Hubbard, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBiggs, J.

This is an action to recover the sum of two hundred and twenty-five dollars, which the plaintiff alleged had been received by the defendants as his agents, and they had refused to pay to him on demand. The defendants denied the indebtedness, and averred that they were real-estate agents, and that the money retained by them was the amount of their commissions on a sale of plaintiff’s property to one O. R. Symmes; that they had been employed by the plaintiff to sell certain real estate, and that, through their efforts, a valid contract for the sale thereof,- upon the terms agreed on, was made…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hayden v. GrilloMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Love v. OwensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Nesbitt v. HelserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  4. Bailey v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  5. Budd v. ZollerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Gilliland v. JaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Donovan v. P. Schoenhofen Brewing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Townsend v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Politte v. WallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API