Budd v. Zoller
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Si. Louis Circuit Court. Plaintiffs procured a party with the money in readiness and willing to loan, the samé upon the property upon certain terms, to all of which defendant agreed, and delivered his title deeds to the agent of the lender for investigation. Her^ the undertaking of the brokers was accomplished and their commission earned. (Barnard vs. Monnot, Am. L. Reg., Yol. VI, 209 ; Bailey vs. Chapman, 41 Mo., 536.)
1Opinion of the CourtVories, Judge
This action was brought before a Justice of the Peace and was founded upon the following account: Charles Zoller, Hr., to Budd, Son & Co., a firm composed of George K. Budd and Charles P. Budd. For commission on loan of $4000 (money obtained by said firm) commissions on same as per agreement 5 per cent., $200.
A trial was had before the Justice and judgment recovered by plaintiff. An appeal was taken to the St. Louis Circuit Court^ where judgment was again rendered for plaintiff, which being affirmed by said court at general term, the defendant appealed to this court.
The case was tried in the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moses v. . BierlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Kock v. EmmerlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Glentworth v. LutherNew York Supreme Court · 1855
- Barnard v. MonnotNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
- Bailey v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fitzpatrick v. GilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Love v. OwensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
- Christensen v. WooleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- Gerhart v. PeckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- Harwood v. DiemerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.