Legal Opinion
Alfredrick Love v. Matthew Cate
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 31, 2011No. 10-55377, 10-55387UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Following proceedings on remand from this panel’s decision in Love v. Scribner (.Love I), 278 Fed.Appx. 714 (9th Cir.2008), the district court granted Petitioner Alfre-derick Love a conditional writ of habeas corpus. Respondent Matthew Cate, Secretary of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), appeals the district court’s decision. Love cross-appeals several of the district court’s procedural and evidentiary rulings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2258. We affirm the decision to grant Love a conditional writ of habeas corpus, and we dismiss his…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Johnson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Felkner v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Richard Craig Kesser v. Steven J. Cambra, Jr., WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lisa Chamberlin v. Marshall Fisher, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Lisa Chamberlin v. Marshall Fisher, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Theodore Israel Madrid Judgment Affirmed en banc JUSTICE HOOD delivered the Opinion of the Court, in which JUSTICE MÁRQUEZ JUSTICE GABRIEL JUSTICE HARTSupreme Court of Colorado · 2023
- Gathrite v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- In re: Pradeep Singh and Rindi P. SinghUnited States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.