Legal Opinion

Felkner v. Jackson

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 21, 2011No. 10-797PublishedCited by 254 opinions

1Per curiam

A California jury convicted respondent Steven Frank Jackson of numerous sexual offenses stemming from his attack on a 72-year-old woman who lived in his apartment complex. Jackson raised a Batson claim, asserting that the prosecutor exercised peremptory challenges to exclude black prospective jurors on the basis of their race. See Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S. 79 (1986). Two of three black jurors had been struck; the third served on the jury. App. to Pet. for Cert. 49-50.

Jackson’s counsel did not object when the prosecutor struck the first of the black jurors, Juror S. Counsel later explained…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Snyder v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by254 opinions

  1. Davis v. AyalaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  2. Rice v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. Hardy v. CrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Warren Lee Hill, Jr. v. Carl HumphreyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  5. United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011

249 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API