Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Mason

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 17, 1926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChichester, J.

On the 9th day of April, 1923, Carson-Davis Construction Company, Inc., entered into a written contract with the Commonwealth of Virginia, acting through the State Highway Commission, for the construction of about 5.2 miles of macadam roadway in Bedford and Amherst counties.

Pursuant to tbe statute (Michie’s Va. Code, 1924, see. 1969-h), the construction company entered into a contract bond, in the penal sum of $57,725, with the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland as surety, conditioned that the “principal shall in all respects comply with the terms and conditions of the said contract and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Stephens v. . HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Bankers' Surety Co. of Cleveland v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Earle-Lansdell Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  5. Scheflow v. . PierceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Conesco Industries, Ltd. A New Jersey Corporation v. Conforti and Eisele, Inc., D. C. A District of Columbia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North America v. Davis' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  3. C. S. Luck & Sons, Inc. v. BoatwrightSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  4. Illinois State Toll Highway Commission Ex Rel. Patten Tractor & Equipment Co. v. M. J. Boyle & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962
  5. Hicks v. RandichWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API