Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

United States v. Kenneth C. Gordon

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 19, 1958No. 11929Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSciinackenberg, Circuit Judge

The most important part of this case has to do with the challenge of defendant to the use of the so-called handbook for jurors. The importance of the question in regard thereto, which was properly raised, argued and decided by the panel which heard this appeal originally, makes the matter of interest to all courts in the United States, including the federal district courts.

The unanimous opinion of the panel was written by retired Circuit Judge Major, a former chief judge of this court, with a background of distinguished service as a practicing lawyer, prosecuting attorney and United States…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. The People v. SchoosIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Otoe County Nat. Bank v. DelanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  5. Reece Folding Mach. Co. v. FenwickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API