Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. Horvitz Co. v. Riebe

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1975No. 34985PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Keenzi/er, C. J.

This is an original action in mandamus. The relator, a general construction company, filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel payment of money owed to it by the city of Cleveland .under three contracts, numbered 25,931, 26,631 and 26,455, and held in funds under the control of the respondents, the city’s Director of Finance, Commissioner of Accounts and Treasurer.

In its petition the relator maintains that the city is under a clear legal duty to pay it the money owed and that it had no adequate remedy at law to compel such payment. A motion to dismiss, filed by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Riley Construction Co. v. East Liverpool City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State ex rel. Ms. Parsons Construction, Inc. v. MoyerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Ms. Parsons Constr., Inc. v. MoyerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State Ex Rel. Mosser Construction, Inc. v. City of ToledoOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Sherman v. HainesOhio Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API