State ex rel. Riley Construction Co. v. East Liverpool City School District Board of Education
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtZimmerman, J.
We think that the remedy of mandamus chosen by relator is properly assertible in this court because of the lack of an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. Time and costs may sometimes be controlling, and, where a school building program, for instance, must be completed promptly with the expenditure of a limited amount of money, this court will entertain an original action in mandamus rather than relegate the parties to the Court of Common Pleas with the delays incident to a determination there and subsequent *28appeals. Moreover, the situs of the controversy is Columbiana County,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Sibarco Corp. v. City of BereaOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- State ex rel. Central Service Station, Inc. v. MasheterOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. State Office Building CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by23 opinions
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Taylor v. GlasserOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. Williams v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Estate of Beavers v. KnappOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.