People v. SUDAR
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
David Wayne Sudar appeals from an order extending his commitment to Napa State Hospital under Penal Code section 1026.5, subdivision (b). He contends his constitutional right to due process was violated by the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury that the prosecution was required to prove he had “serious difficulty controlling his dangerous behavior.” He further contends the petition should have been dismissed because it was not filed within the time specified by statute. We affirm.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS
In 1999, appellant was found not guilty by reason of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- People v. Howard N.California Supreme Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. Phan CA6California Court of Appeal · 2013
- People v. RedusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020