Legal Opinion

State v. . Riley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 21, 1924PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IIoice, O. J.

Defendants excepted, first, that they were ruled to a trial of the cause at the same term the bill of indictment was found and so soon after the alleged theft that they were, in effect, denied the right to obtain necessary evidence; but our decisions are to the effect that this is a matter within the discretion of the trial judge and not the basis of a valid exception, unless, there has been manifest abuse, and, on the facts presented, we are of opinion'that no such abuse has been made to appear. S. v. Burnett, 184 N. C., 783; S. v. Sultan, 142 N. C., 569.

Defendants excepted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Simmons v. Davenport.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. State v. Andrew.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1867
  4. State v. . DickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1864
  5. State v. Sultan.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. . LeaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  2. State v. . SaulsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. State v. . HolbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. HackneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. GuffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API