Legal Opinion

United States v. Walker

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided November 28, 1995No. 3:94-cr-00328PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION & ORDER

McAVOY, Chief Judge.

The government has indicated that it intends to call two defense-retained experts whom the defense does not at this time intend to call as witnesses. They are Donald Frangipani, a ballistics expert previously retained by Walter Diaz’s attorney in a New York State prosecution, and John Dillon, a ballistics expert retained by defendant Tyr one Walker to assist in the defense of this prosecution. Unfortunately, the government saw fit to forecast its intentions to the jury in its opening statement instead of taking the more prudent course of seeking…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Wilfredo Alvarez Appeal of John A/K/A Jorge MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Jesse Ray PipkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. William WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. SutherlandIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Lugosch v. CongelDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
  4. State v. HamletWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. DunnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API