Legal Opinion

State v. Hamlet

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1997No. 64620-1PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

944 P.2d 1026 (1997)

133 Wash.2d 314

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Roderick HAMLET, Petitioner.

No. 64620-1.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued June 10, 1997.

Decided October 9, 1997.

John Quirk, Michele Shaw, Seattle, for Petitioner.

Norm Maleng, King County Prosecutor, Lee Yates, Deputy, Seattle, for Respondent.

Jeffrey Ellis, Defender Ass'n, Seattle, for amicus Washington Ass'n of Criminal Defense.

MADSEN, Justice.

The jury convicted Defendant of first degree assault, rejecting his claim of diminished capacity. Defendant contends the trial court erred in ordering disclosure of the name…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. MacOnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  4. State v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. In Re Stranger CreekWashington Supreme Court · 1970

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. EllisWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Mission Springs Inc. v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  4. Trusky v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. BottrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API