Prappas v. Meyerland Community Improvement Ass'n
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
*795OPINION
JUNELL, Justice.
Lis pendens provides a mechanism for putting the public on notice of certain categories of litigation involving real property. This case raises the issue whether a lis pendens is a part of the judicial process so that the resulting absolute privilege bars a damage suit over the filing of the lis pendens. Prior decisions indicate that the answer is yes. Griffin v. Rowden, 702 S.W.2d 692 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1985, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Kropp v. Prather, 526 S.W.2d 283 (Tex.Civ.App.-Tyler 1975, writ ref’d n.r.e.). We must decide whether the outcome changes if (a) the lis pendens…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Sakowitz, Inc. v. SteckTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Dethlefs v. Beau Maison Development Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1987
- Kropp v. PratherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Runge v. FranklinTexas Supreme Court · 1889
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Bayou Terrace Investment Corp. v. Lyles, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
- Thornburg v. Lynch (In Re Thornburg)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Texas · 2002
- In Re Jamail, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Manders v. MandersDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.