Legal Opinion

Matter of Kleeman

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri

Decided September 23, 1985No. 19-20254PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEBTORS’ APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT

DENNIS J. STEWART, Bankruptcy Judge.

Pursuant to prior adequate notice, the court attempted, on August 30, 1985, to convene a hearing on the sufficiency of the debtors’ proposed disclosure statement in Joplin, Missouri. Several of the creditors then appeared for the purpose of objecting to the sufficiency of the disclosure statement under the standards of section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code and for the purpose of aiding the processing of this chapter 11 case by suggesting amendments and supplementations to the proposed disclosure statement.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Albert Flaksa v. Little River Marine Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. In Re MoogDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1985
  3. In Re MissouriUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of BerryhillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
  2. Matter of SlackUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1987
  3. Matter of LaddUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
  4. In Re ForsterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1993
  5. In Re Bayou Self, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API