Legal Opinion

Eidson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 22, 1942No. 29279PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Herb Eidson was tried under an indictment containing 3 counts. Count 3 was abandoned. The defendant was acquitted on count 1 and convicted on count 2.' A motion for new trial was filed on the general grounds, to which an amendment containing 9 special grounds was allowed. The motion was overruled and the defendant excepted. Special ground 1 is abandoned. Special grounds 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9 are lacking in merit to the extent of warranting a reversal or a detailed discussion. The general grounds will not be discussed, because the assignments of error as to special ground 2 demand a reversal.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  2. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Bates v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co. v. IngramSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
  2. Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Sechler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  4. Pinkston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  5. Pinkston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API