Eidson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
Herb Eidson was tried under an indictment containing 3 counts. Count 3 was abandoned. The defendant was acquitted on count 1 and convicted on count 2.' A motion for new trial was filed on the general grounds, to which an amendment containing 9 special grounds was allowed. The motion was overruled and the defendant excepted. Special ground 1 is abandoned. Special grounds 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9 are lacking in merit to the extent of warranting a reversal or a detailed discussion. The general grounds will not be discussed, because the assignments of error as to special ground 2 demand a reversal.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shropshire v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Bates v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Hilton & Dodge Lumber Co. v. IngramSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1988
- Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Sechler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Pinkston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Pinkston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949