Legal Opinion

Bates v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 24, 1916No. 7793PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Indictment for uttering forged checks; from Upson superior court — Judge Searcy. July 12, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtHodges, J.

Matthew Bates was convicted upon an indictment charging that he did fraudulently make, sign, and print, and was concerned with the fraudulent passing and uttering of a certain check, together with one Marcellus Bates. His motion for new trial was overrtded and he.excepted.

1. The trial judge admitted in evidence a certain conversation between the sheriff, another witness, and one Dr. Fogg, deceased, in which the doctor in the presence of these parties and the accused, made a statement, in'substance as follows: “This defendant, in company with a man who claimed the name of Williams, came to my…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Wood v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  3. Frank v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  4. People v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Commonwealth v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  2. Daniels v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Spurlin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  4. Collins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Goldberg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API