Legal Opinion
Valley Chevrolet Co. v. Whitaker
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 5, 1966No. 7926PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOE W. WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals.
This appeal is from a judgment in a re-plevin action. It raises one issue: at what point in time is the value of the property to be fixed under § 22-17-7, N.M.S.A. 1953?
Plaintiff and defendant entered a contingent sale agreement under which plaintiff would attempt to sell defendant’s truck and dependent on the sale defendant would purchase two vehicles from plaintiff. Defendant obtained possession of the two vehicles under this agreement. When the contingent sale failed to develop, plaintiff demanded return of the two vehicles, which demand was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lyster v. Town of Las VegasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- Jackson v. GoadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Bokum v. ElkinsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
- Banes Agency v. ChinoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1955
- Heisch v. J. L. Bell & Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Muncey v. Eyeglass World, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Crosby v. Basin Motor CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- AG New Mexico, FCS, ACA v. Borges (In re Borges)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
- Muncey v. Eyeglass World, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012