Legal Opinion
Crosby v. Basin Motor Company
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 6, 1971No. 672PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
Crosby sued Basin Motor Company and First National Bank of Farmington to recover damages for statutory violations of the provisions on Default, Part 5, Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code, including conversion. This pertained to the repossession and resale of a pickup truck. Basin counterclaimed for $400.00 as a result of Crosby’s default. The trial court denied recovery to Crosby and Basin. Crosby appeals.
Crosby abandoned his claims against First National Bank. Basin did not appear or respond in this court.
We reverse.
The trial court found: Basin sold Crosby a 1961…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cruzan v. Franklin Stores CorporationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
- Charley v. Rico Motor CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- Valley Chevrolet Co. v. WhitakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wells v. Central Bank of Alabama, N.A.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Muncey v. Eyeglass World, LLCNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
- Northwest Bank & Trust Co. v. GutshallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Cornell v. Albuquerque Chemical Co., Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
- Coxall v. Clover Commercial Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.