Legal Opinion

Siddall v. City of Michigan City

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 25, 1985No. 3-185A3PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Appellants, members of a class of police officers employed by or retired from the 'Michigan City Uniform Patrol Division, bring this appeal from the grant of a summary judgment in favor of Michigan City. The appeal presents one issue for review: whether the trial court erred in granting a summary judgment in favor of Michigan City on the basis of laches and failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

The standard of review of a summary judgment requires the appellate court to ascertain that no genuine issue of material fact exists and that the law was correctly applied to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. United States v. Lexington Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Marksill Specialties, Inc. v. BargerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Williams v. RogierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Habig v. BruningIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Irmscher v. McCue Ex Rel. McCueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Plant v. Howard Johnson's Motor LodgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Shearer v. Pla-Boy, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API