Legal Opinion
Habig v. Bruning
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 1993No. 29A02-9208-CV-355PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHIELDS, Judge.
Robert and Elaine Habig appeal the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Gilbert Bruning, Jack Samuelson, and Samuelson-Bruning Engineering and Construetion, Inc. (hereinafter "Bruning"). We reverse.
ISSUES
1. Did the trial court err in determining that the Habigs' claim was barred by the statute of limitations?
2. Did the trial court err in determining that the Habigs' claim was barred by the doctrine of laches?
FACTS
The facts construed most favorably to the Habigs, as the nonmoving party to a motion for summary judgment, are as follows. On November 5, 1988, the Habigs…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Oelling v. RaoIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Wehling v. Citizens National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Barnes v. AH Robins Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1985
- Burks v. RushmoreIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
- Bailey v. MartzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Perryman v. Motorist Mutual Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Jean Pierre Frey v. Bank OneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Town Council of New Harmony v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Meisenhelder v. Zipp Express, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Shafer v. LambieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.