Legal Opinion
Ironworks Patents, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 12, 2017No. Civ. No. 10-258-SLRPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROBINSON, Senior District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
On March 31, 2010, plaintiff MobileMe-dia Ideas LLC (“MMI”) filed suit against defendant Apple, Inc. (“defendant”), alleging infringement of a number of patents including- U.S. Patent No. RE 39,231 (“the ’231 patent”). As part of an extensive motion practice, on November 8, 2012, the court construed the relevant claim terms of the ’231 patent and granted summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of defendant. (D.I. 461 at 45) The court denied reconsideration (D.I. 539, 540), and the parties went to trial on the other…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Amgen Inc. v. Hospira, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018
- In re MarinariUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Marshall v. AbdounUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Ryan Kerwin & Xtreme Caged Combat v. RosenblumUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Steven RosenblumUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020