Legal Opinion

Ryan Kerwin & Xtreme Caged Combat v. Rosenblum

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 2020No. 19-00241Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Inre : Chapter 13 Steven Rosenblum : Debtor : Case No. 14-19756 (AMC) Ryan Kerwin & Xtreme Caged Combat: Plaintiff : Adv. Proc. No. 19-241 (AMC) V. : Steven Rosenblum : Defendant : MEMORANDUM OPINION Introduction Before the Court are two identical motions filed by pro se creditor Ryan Kerwin (“Kerwin”) in both the Debtor’s main bankruptcy proceeding and in an adversary proceeding filed by Kerwin against the Debtor Steven Rosenblum.' The first motion is entitled Creditor’s Motion to Reinstate his Motion to Alter or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. In re RosenblumUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. In re MarinariUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Martin Fountain v. Warden James T Vaughn CorrectiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  5. McSparran v. CommonwealthDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API