Legal Opinion

Nisqually Indian Tribe v. Gregoire

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 4, 2010No. 09-35725PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, Circuit Judge:

The Nisqually Indian Tribe (“Nisqually”) challenges an agreement between the Frank’s Landing Indian Community (the “Community”), the Squaxin Island Indian Tribe 1 (“Squaxin”), and the State of Washington 2 (‘Washington” or the “State”) governing taxation of cigarettes at Frank’s Landing. Nisqually brought suit claiming that Washington breached a contract with Nisqually by entering into the agreement with Squaxin and the Community, and further argues that the agreement violates various state and federal laws. With respect to Nisquall/s attempts to enforce federal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lamie v. United States TrusteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Graham-Sult v. ClainosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
  3. Alexander Graham-Sult v. Nicholas ClainosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Peltier v. Almar Management, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2017
  5. Wolfchild v. Redwood CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API