Legal Opinion
Peltier v. Almar Management, Inc.
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided January 17, 2017No. CV. NO. 16-00431 DKW-RLPPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT ALMAR MANAGEMENT, INC.’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
Derrick K. Watson, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
Craig Peltier brings this action against his former employer, Almar Management, Inc. (“Almar”), for failure to pay wages in accordance with Hawaii Revised Statutes (“HRS”) § 103-55 and for breach of contract, as an alleged third-party beneficiary of a contract between Almar and a state agency. Because no private right of action exists to enforce HRS § 103-55, Almar’s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brush v. Miami Beach Healthcare Group Ltd.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2017
- STUCKEY v. APEX MATERIALS, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2026