McAlpine v. Sweetser
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Vanderburgh Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Morris, C.
This action was commenced by the appellees for the purpose of compelling George Baumgartner, one of the appellants, to pay over to them the sum of $94, which he held as constable of Pigeon township, and which, as the appellees contend, rightfully belonged to them. The other applicants were made defendants on the ground that they claimed that the money belonged to them.
Two of the defendants below, Gruehn and Baumgartner, made default. The other appellants appeared to the action and moved to strike out portions of the complaint. The motion was overruled. They then demurred to the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Comm'rs of Leavenworth Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Hendrick v. WhittemoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Candee v. . LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Dougherty's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
- Bonsall v. IsettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Quarl v. AbbettIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Cavanaugh v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Jackson v. State ex rel. DyarIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Town of Cicero v. WilliamsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
- Chehalis Coal Co. v. LaisureWashington Supreme Court · 1917
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.