Legal Opinion

Bertha v. Regal Motor Car Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1914No. Docket No. 27PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hally, J. Case by Louis Bertha against the Regal Motor Car Company for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, C. J.

Plaintiff and appellant brought suit against defendant in an action to recover damages for injuries received by him while in its employment, whereby he lost the sight of one of his eyes, claimed to have been caused by the negligence of defendant. The case was brought on for trial before the court and a jury, and, at the close of plaintiff’s case, on *52motion of defendant, a verdict was directed by the court in its behalf against the plaintiff. From a judgment duly entered upon this instructed verdict in favor of defendant, plaintiff has removed the case to this court upon writ of error.

In…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stefanac v. Cranbrook Educational CommunityMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Cudahy Bros. v. West Michigan Dock & Market Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Bullock v. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  4. Gloeser v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Tylee v. Illinois Central RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API