Legal Opinion

King v. Tinsley

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 13, 1965No. 21615PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frantz

This writ of error is directed to the trial court’s denial of King’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Originally, King pled guilty to a charge of illegal possession of narcotics. In his present petition he alleges that the evidence of the crime was obtained as a result of an unreasonable search and seizure and that his counsel at trial knew this but nevertheless “induced” him to enter a plea of guilty.

Where a petition for habeas corpus itself shows that the party can neither be discharged nor admitted to bail nor in any other manner be relieved, the trial court should summarily deny the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Specht v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Bizup v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  3. Titmus v. TinsleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reed v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Ryan v. CroninSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  3. Andretti v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API