Ryan v. Cronin
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
This appeal was taken after the district court made a writ of habeas corpus absolute. Review of a ruling on a writ of habeas corpus lies in this court. Section 13-4-102( 1)(c), C.R.S. 1973.
The question which is before us is whether the writ of habeas corpus may be used in the district court as a means to review a contempt conviction in the county court. We hold that the proper means for review in this case was by appeal and not by habeas corpus, and accordingly,- we reverse and remand with directions that the writ of habeas corpus be discharged.
The appellants had custody of Gerold R. Ryan.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Hithe v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Leonhart v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
- Losavio v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR TENTH JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kailey v. Colorado State Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Marshall v. KortSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- People v. AleemSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- Mulkey v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- White v. RicketsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.