Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Cronin

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 30, 1976No. 27201PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

This appeal was taken after the district court made a writ of habeas corpus absolute. Review of a ruling on a writ of habeas corpus lies in this court. Section 13-4-102( 1)(c), C.R.S. 1973.

The question which is before us is whether the writ of habeas corpus may be used in the district court as a means to review a contempt conviction in the county court. We hold that the proper means for review in this case was by appeal and not by habeas corpus, and accordingly,- we reverse and remand with directions that the writ of habeas corpus be discharged.

The appellants had custody of Gerold R. Ryan.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Ex Parte TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Hithe v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  4. Leonhart v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  5. Losavio v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR TENTH JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kailey v. Colorado State Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. Marshall v. KortSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. People v. AleemSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
  4. Mulkey v. SullivanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  5. White v. RicketsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API