Agrizap, Inc. v. Woodstream Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERT F. KELLY, SR., District Judge.
Presently pending before me is Defendant Woodstream Corporation’s (“Woodstream”) motion to suppress the changes that non-party witness Patrick J. Frape (“Frape”) made to his deposition transcript. For the following reasons, Woodstream’s Motion is granted.1
I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND
The relationship between Plaintiff, Agrizap, Inc. (“Agrizap”) and Woodstream began in 2000. Woodstream contacted Agrizap about the possibility of the two parties entering into a marketing agreement for Agrizap’s Rat Zapper Product. The Rat Zapper is a consumer product that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gloria Rios v. F. Calvin Bigler, M.D. And Lauren A. Welch, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Greenway v. International Paper Co.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1992
- Lugtig v. ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
- Tingley Systems, Inc. v. CSC Consulting, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Duff v. Lobdell-Emery Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- EBC, Inc. v. Clark Building System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Aetna Inc. v. Express Scripts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Floride Norelus v. Denny's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- INTERVET, INC. v. MILEUTIS LTD.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- Norelus v. Denny's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.