Norelus v. Denny's, Inc.

The court states that “[t]he issue [in this appeal] is whether creating and submitting the sixty-three page errata document and then continuing to press forward with Norelus’s claims, which had been left completely unsupported once the errata document rendered her testimony useless, constituted conduct sanctionable under [28 U.S.C.] § 1927.” Ante at 485. The Am-longs1 did prepare the sixty-three page document, which they labeled “errata sheet” (“ ‘errata sheet’ ” or “errata document”), but they did not present it to the court reporter, as Rule 30(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure…