Legal Opinion

State v. Montgomery

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1980No. 79-251PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in the instant cause is whether it was permissible for the trial court, on the authority of R. C. 2945.72(H), to sua sponte continue appellee’s trial date beyond the statutory period prescribed in R. C. 2945.71(C)(2).

The General Assembly has enacted R. C. 2945.71 through 2945.73 in a legislative attempt to quantify a defendant’s right to a speedy trial as guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Klopfer v. North Carolina (1967), 386 U. S. 213; Barker v. Wingo (1972), 407 U. S. 514; Section 10 of Article I of the Constitution of Ohio; State…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. MacDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. LeeOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State v. LaddOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. MincyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. Cross, 07-Ma-74 (6-27-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. State v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State v. HavensOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API