Legal Opinion

State v. Ladd

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1978No. 78-116PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaul W. Beowu, J.

The only issue presented on appeal here is whether the defendant is entitled to a discharge-pursuant to R. C. 2945.71 through 2945.73, the Criminal Code’s speedy trial provisions. R. C. 2945.73 reads as follows :

“ (B) Upon motion made at or prior to the commencement of trial, a person charged with an offense shall be discharged if he is not brought to trial within the time required by sections 2945.71 and 2945.72 of the Revised Code.”

R. C. 2945.71 provides in relevant part:

- “ (C) A person against whom a charge of felony is pending:

*

“(2) Shall be brought to trial within two hundred seventy…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. State v. MacDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. PughOhio Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. State v. PachayOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. O'BrienOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. ButcherOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. SanchezOhio Supreme Court · 2006

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API