Legal Opinion
Borough of Lansdale v. Philadelphia Electric Company
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 8, 1982No. 82-1255PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in a case brought under § 2 of the Sherman Act, 1 our major task is to decide if the district court erred in not setting aside the jury’s finding with respect to the definition of the relevant geographic market. Appellant, the Borough of Lansdale, operates a small retail electric company. Failing to obtain certain services from the Philadelphia Electric Company, Lansdale brought an antitrust action but did not prevail before the jury. Before us on this appeal, it now argues that the geographic…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Tampa Electric Co. v. Nashville Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Otter Tail Power Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Smithkline Corporation v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Weiss v. York HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Alan D. Gordon, M.D. Alan D. Gordon, M.D., P.C., a Corporation Mifflin County Community Surgical Center, a Corporation v. Lewistown HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. Aspen Skiing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Joe Garza-Juarez and Esteban Garza-Juarez, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- White and White, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.