United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Joe Garza-Juarez and Esteban Garza-Juarez, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge:
We are presented with cross appeals. Appellants Joe Juarez and Esteban Juarez, who were convicted on charges stemming from the sale of firearms and the possession of unregistered suppressors (silencers), present questions of entrapment and improper and vindictive prosecutorial conduct. The government appeals from the district court’s downward departure from the sentencing guidelines recommendations, the sentencing court being of the view that the government’s investigatory conduct was sufficiently coercive to warrant.a mitigation of the sentences. We affirm the…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by125 opinions
- United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Stacey C. Koon, Cross-Appellee. United States of America v. Laurence M. Powell, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- State v. LivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- United States v. Pedro L. Castillo and Frank RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Mark William Paul StauferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.