Legal Opinion
Barnard v. Seaman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 31, 1926No. Nos. 25,656-25,658PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDibebl, J.
Three actions by the plaintiff as trustee in bankruptcy of Henry (x. Seaman to set aside conveyances of land in Itasca county as fraudulent as to creditors were tried together. In each there were findings for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal from orders denying their separate motions for a new trial.
Seven conveyances dated February 2, 1924, from Seaman to his daughter Dora E. Seaman were recorded on April 24, 1924, covering land in Itasca county, which Seaman owned under state land certificates not fully paid. They covered about 280 acres of land constituting Seaman’s farm.
A conveyance…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Olsson v. Midland InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Second National Bank v. DonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Leqve v. StoppelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Manwaring v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
- Stephon v. TopicSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- O'Leary v. WangensteenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Citizens State Bank of Hayfield v. LethCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Watson v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Nash v. BengtsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Weese v. WeeseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.