Legal Opinion

Glassmeyer v. Glassmeyer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 1958No. 8457PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

At the trial of this cause, plaintiff-appellee’s counsel made an opening statement, at the conclusion of which defendant-appellant’s counsel made a motion for judgment on the pleadings and opening statement. By leave of the court, plaintiff’s counsel was permitted to supplement his opening statement. Thereupon, he read the written agreement sued upon, and, in addition, said: “As I said before, this action is brought by the administrator who contends that there have been no payments made since September 1, 1953. There is no denial in the answer or no affirmative pleading that payments have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tiffany v. TiffanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. Strong v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Piatt v. Heim & Overly Realty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1938
  4. Thompson v. SchalkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RobertsOhio Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Bainum v. Patton, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API