Legal Opinion

Bainum v. Patton

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided December 9, 1968No. A-220405Published

1Opinion of the CourtBettman, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from the Cincinnati Municipal Court. The facts set out in the amended narrative bill of exceptions in brief are as follows. Plaintiff brought suit on a promissory note. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s evidence defendant moved for a directed verdict on the ground that the note was conditional on its face and there was no proof that the condition had been satisfied. The court said that in its opinion the note was conditional upon its face and it was inclined to grant defendant’s motion but, in the interest of justice, it would permit plaintiff to reopen…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jacob Laub Baking Co. v. MiddletonOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Worthington v. McGoughCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  3. Glassmeyer v. GlassmeyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Rush v. RushOhio Court of Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API