Legal Opinion

In re the Last Will & Testament of Crockett

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided July 15, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Proceeding upon the probate of a will.

1Opinion of the Court

Schultz, S.

An adult niece of the testatrix filed objections *394to her will; thereupon the special guardian for the infants interested also filed an answer containing objections.

The testimony in this matter, in my opinion, fully establishes that all the statutory requirements were observed in the execution of the will of the decedent; that at the time of such execution the decedent was competent to make a will and that the same was not the result of any undue influence exercised upon her.

The persons named as beneficiaries appear to have been on good terms with her. When she was ill and they were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Children's Aid Society v. . LoveridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Rollwagen v. . RollwagenNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Loder v. . WhelpleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  4. In re the Probate of Papers Propounded as the Last Will & Testament & a Codicil thereto of Van NessNew York Surrogate's Court · 1912
  5. In re Campbell's WillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Bright's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Williard v. BrightMontana Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API