Legal Opinion

Irwin v. Burgan

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 3, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case turns on alleged procedural errors. To show what they were we must state the facts at some length.

On May 18, 1925, the respondent filed a bill in equity in the Circuit Court of Jackson County against the appellants Burgan: (a) for the rescission of a contract whereunder he had purchased a theatre from them; (b) to recover back $5,000 cash consideration paid; and (c) to cancel two promissory notes of $2500 each, made to the appellant H.V. Burgan, due respectively in one and two years, these also being a part of the purchase price. The petition alleged the sale was induced by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Potter v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Ward v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  3. Hurley v. KennallySupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  4. Schneider v. PattonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  5. Ball v. Peper Cotton Press Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wagner v. RuddySupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. State Ex Rel. Berbiglia, Inc. v. RandallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Thompson v. HodgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Moss v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938
  5. Kenneth Ferguson v. Curators of Lincoln University, In Their Official Capacities, a/k/a Lincoln UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API