Legal Opinion

Kenneth Ferguson v. Curators of Lincoln University, In Their Official Capacities, a/k/a Lincoln University

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2016No. WD78752 and WD78777 and WD78784PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaren King Mitchell, Judge

The Board of Curators for Lincoln University (Lincoln) appeals the trial court’s judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdict, finding Lincoln liable for age discrimination under the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA) against former Lincoln employee, Kenneth Ferguson. Lincoln brings three points on appeal, arguing error in the admission of evidence, lack of sufficient evidence to make a submissible case, and error in the award of attorneys’ fees. Ferguson cross-appeals, arguing that the trial court failed to consider additional time required to respond to post-trial motions in calculating the amount…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Desert Palace, Inc. v. CostaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Heifetz v. Apex Clayton, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2018
  2. Kerr v. Missouri Veterans CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Rita Lynne Terpstra v. State of Missouri, Department of Labor and Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. William McGhee v. Schreiber Foods, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State ex rel. Hawley v. Pilot Travel Ctrs., LLCSupreme Court of Missouri · 2018

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API