Legal Opinion

Edinger & Co. v. Southwestern Surety Insurance

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 3, 1918PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Second Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

Edinger & Company bad a policy of insurance in the Southwestern Surety Insurance Company indemnifying it against loss and expense arising from claims upon it for damages on account of bodily injury accidentally suffered by any person during the period of the policy that was caused by horses or vehicles in the service of Edinger & Company. The policy, however, contained a clause exempting it from liability for injury and resulting damage caued by vicious horses that might be used by Edinger & Company.

While this policy was in force Gr. T. Humphrey,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Inhabitants of Westfield v. MayoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Board of Councilmen v. VanarsdallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Catterlin v. City of FrankfortIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Elliott v. SaufleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Builders Supply Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Gamble-Skogmo, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  3. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. BissellMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Columbia Casualty Co. v. Hare, Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. Clinchfield Railroad v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API