Legal Opinion

Vaughan v. Cox

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided August 29, 2003No. 00-14380PublishedCited by 190 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before CARNES, COX and NOONAN * , Circuit Judges. COX, Circuit Judge:

We grant rehearing sua sponte. In our original opinion, reported at 264 F.3d 1027 (11th Cir.2001), we concluded that Deputy Fred Lawrence Cox was entitled to summary judgment as to his qualified immunity defense on Jerry Charges Vaughan’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims arising out of injuries Vaughan suffered during a police chase. The Supreme Court granted certiorari, Vaughan v. Cox, 536 U.S. 953, 122 S.Ct. 2653, 153 L.Ed.2d 830 (2002), vacated our judgment, and remanded this…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by190 opinions

  1. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Mullenix v. LunaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Plumhoff v. RickardSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Holloman Ex Rel. Holloman v. HarlandCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Mark Atkinson v. City of Mountain ViewCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013

185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API