Legal Opinion

Byrd v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 17, 1913No. 2835PublishedCited by 9 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was indicted, tried and convicted for unlawfully practicing medicine, without registering his certificate authorizing him to so practice in the office of the District Clerk for Delta County, Texas, and his' punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and confinement for one day in the county jail.

After the necessary formal part of the indictment, it charges that appellant on or about March 1, 1913, and' before the indictment was presented, “in the County of Delta, and State of Texas, did then and there unlawfully engage in the practice of medicine and offer to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Collins v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Parks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Eastman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. People v. PhippinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. State v. DentWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Robertus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Collins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. State v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API