Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1934No. 6072PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

The defendant for a number of years had been a real estate broker. In 1932, however, he did not obtain a license to act as a real estate broker as required by title 53, chap. 22, I. C. A. About March 1st, of said year he approached or was approached by Gustave Lang relative to the purchase by Lang of certain real property then belonging to a Mrs. Christensen. An “earnest money receipt” was made out signed by Lang as purchaser and by Johnson as “agent” for the owner; $150 being paid down on the purchase price of $3,000. Thereafter the defendant by written contract signed by himself and Mrs.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. McLennanIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State v. FarnsworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State v. O'NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State v. CorcoranIdaho Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Fealy v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SedamIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State v. GrazianIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. GrosecloseIdaho Supreme Court · 1946
  4. State v. BarrIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  5. State v. HuffIdaho Supreme Court · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API