United States v. Ford
District Court, D. Montana
1Opinion of the Court
BOURQUIN, District Judge.
In these proceedings in contempt, the only issue is the sufficiency of the evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt the charge of which the details sufficiently appear in what follows. The evidence is that during one Gordon Campbell’s trial in this court, and including pending proceedings in error, defendant was and is his principal counsel. In that behalf, defendant filed a bill of exceptions containing 55 exceptions to rulings of the court, of which 27 exceptions have no existence in fact. Thereafter defendant, by agent, presented in chambers and without service…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Osborne v. PurdomeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- United States v. Harold A. ThoreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1929
- United States v. Custer Channel Wing CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.